Previously we had only a Rails validation which ensured poll participation
uniqueness but this adds uniqueness control to the database level, so that
uniqueness is guaranteed even when changing data with avoiding Rails
validations.
closes#7798
Some podmins were confuse how they can disable this redirect and I think
the rule with two users can actually be a little confusing. I think the
main goal of this page to give the podmin a little start and I think
after they configured everything, the pod works and they found the link
to the wiki to make themself an admin, it is OK to remove the redirect.
Also it's bad for single-user pods where this page always stays active,
even if they are an admin, but have only one user. It's more useful for
single-user pods to have the login on the home page.
closes#7783
If a user scrolls just below the 1000px threshold and clicks the back-to-top button within 250ms, we'll never hide the button as the scroll event gets throttled away. That's rather inconvenient.
closes#7729
Camo only proxies images hosted somewhere else, so it doesn't make sense
to add the proxied versions to search engines. It only creates traffic
for camo when /camo/* urls are in search results.
closes#7726
When there were posts with many followed tags they were returned
multiple times, resulting in less than 15 unique posts. That resulted in
some posts to be missed in the stream.
Fixes#4503closes#7715
We only return `nil` when we know the person, but don't know the key or
the key is invalid, so it doesn't make sense to retry in this case. When
the person isn't known and can't be fetched we raise a DiscoveryError
which will be retried.
Also the errors were moved to the `Signable` module in the last release.
closes#7717
Use this tag for tests which can't work with PhantomJS, but which we
can run with Selenium using some other profile (not implemented here).
closes#6418
Currently, git checks are performed on server start, even when outside a git
repository.
This commit verify the presence of a git repository (via `git status` exit
code), and perform checks only if it exists.
closes#7712
This is to let the author of the post know, that this pod is interested
in updates about this post.
The sending user is only used to verify that the participation was sent
from this pod, but lets use an admin/podmin account if available.
closes#7708
Some people may remove their birthday date after the notification was
sent, which then breaks the notification page for other users. Let's
just display the date when the notification was created, and not display
the users updated birthday date. When users update from date A to B it
always looks weird anyway, when we display the same new date B twice on
different days, or display two different dates for the same user.
We could remove notifications when users change or remove their
birthday, but that would be way more complex and also we usually don't
remove notifications (not even for deleted posts).
Fixes#7689closes#7691
Some people may remove their birthday date after the notification was
sent, which then breaks the notification page for other users. Let's
just display the date when the notification was created, and not display
the users updated birthday date. When users update from date A to B it
always looks weird anyway, when we display the same new date B twice on
different days, or display two different dates for the same user.
We could remove notifications when users change or remove their
birthday, but that would be way more complex and also we usually don't
remove notifications (not even for deleted posts).
Fixes#7689closes#7691
